Gun control is always linked to socialism, communism, monarchy, or some other kind of oppressive government.
How many people were killed in car accidents last year?
How many people were killed by firearms last year?
But we are not going to outlaw cars and car shows?
Lets just all panic because someone shot an elected official in Arizona. But when little Suzy fell into a pool and drowned, I bet the local news barely mentioned it, much less the world news.
Talk of gun control after an event is nothing more then reactionism.
If someone commits a crime with a firearm – punish that person. But do not burden law abiding gun owners with more restrictions. To quote a scene from Red Dawn – “if a fox steals a chicken, you do not punish the pig.”
The world is full of bad things, whether its mercury in the tuna, lead in the drinking water,,,,,,, the world is never going to be a perfect place.
We already have plenty of gun laws on the books, enforce the ones we have first.
With self governor comes self responsibility. Those that can not use their rights without harming others, should have their rights taken away (prison), but do not punish the majority for the actions of the few.
Look at the people that get convicted of assault or even murder. Chances are they have a record a mile long, and chances are the state had a “3 strikes and your out law” somewhere on the books. So why are they on the streets to start with?
With prisons already overloaded, where is society supposed to put repeat offenders? That is, until they commit the most violent of crimes – and then its too late.
A few weeks ago there were some murders in Beaumont Texas. Come to find out the suspect had a record so long, they must have installed a revolving door on the jail just for him. Between early release, and reduced prison terms, this guy was in and out of prison like it was a candy store. The question I have to ask was “why”? Why did it take the guy murdering someone before he was sent to prison for life? Maybe because prison is not a warehouse? Prison is not for people who “might” harm society. We have to wait until the deed is done, and then we do something.
I firmly believe that people have the right to protect themselves, their family and their property.
I also believe the people have the right for armed rebellion – but only as a last resort. If it was good enough for the militia and George Washington in 1776, its good enough for us.
The protest in Egypt, and the calls for the government to step down going on right now. How much different would it be if the people were armed? I think things would be a lot different.
Timinin square 1989, things might have turned out a little different if the citizens had been armed.
What makes Egypt and Timinin square so much different then the American Revolution? The Americans were armed.
Showing posts with label Republican National Committee. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Republican National Committee. Show all posts
Tuesday, February 22, 2011
Wednesday, March 11, 2009
The blame game
An email that the Republican National Committee sent out has an interesting statement in it.
No matter what flowery rhetoric Barack Obama uses to defend his massive tax-and-spend policies, one thing is clear: Everybody in America will pay their share of the enormous price. (Jonah Goldberg, "Waiting Game," NationalReview.com, 3/6/2009)
The president can not raise or lower taxes. All tax laws HAVE to be introduced in the House of Representatives. The founding fathers made it this way so that the people can not be taxed without representation, also know as - no taxation without representation.
Since the president is not elected by the people, he can not change the tax laws.
But, for some reason the Republican National Committee wants the people to believe that president can raise and lower taxes with the stroke of a pen.
The people that are responsible for raising and lowering our taxes are our representatives and senators. Those people are the ones that introduce and vote on the bills before they ever land on the presidents desk.
This all goes back to an uneducated voting populace. If the people want real change, the two major parties HAVE to be removed from power. The only way to do that is to vote third party.
No matter what flowery rhetoric Barack Obama uses to defend his massive tax-and-spend policies, one thing is clear: Everybody in America will pay their share of the enormous price. (Jonah Goldberg, "Waiting Game," NationalReview.com, 3/6/2009)
The president can not raise or lower taxes. All tax laws HAVE to be introduced in the House of Representatives. The founding fathers made it this way so that the people can not be taxed without representation, also know as - no taxation without representation.
Since the president is not elected by the people, he can not change the tax laws.
But, for some reason the Republican National Committee wants the people to believe that president can raise and lower taxes with the stroke of a pen.
The people that are responsible for raising and lowering our taxes are our representatives and senators. Those people are the ones that introduce and vote on the bills before they ever land on the presidents desk.
This all goes back to an uneducated voting populace. If the people want real change, the two major parties HAVE to be removed from power. The only way to do that is to vote third party.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)